Here are pointers to the articles so far in this series:
MIT India and Urja have also generated a great deal of discussion, which I welcome you to read and participate in.
Lucid is a new piece, and I expect, will generate similar discussion soon.
India’s leading venture capital and startup blog
Here are pointers to the articles so far in this series:
MIT India and Urja have also generated a great deal of discussion, which I welcome you to read and participate in.
Lucid is a new piece, and I expect, will generate similar discussion soon.
This is a new series in which I invite readers to take a journey with me into the future through the minds of multiple entrepreneurs, who by addressing the opportunities I see today, will perhaps shape the future of India.
But in this series, we will close our eyes, and exist in this future, and BE each entrepreneur. To read the first of these posts, click here.
Enjoy!
My new Forbes column Bootstrap Yourself highlights Silicon Valley’s hottest new trend, Bootstrapping. Indian entrepreneurs, you need to embrace this trend, given that the early stage venture capital industry doesn’t quite have its act together yet.
Great bootstrapping case studies I have covered are Sridhar Vembu, Frank Levinson and Jerry Rawls, Cree Lawson, and Beatrice Tarka. Sridhar, Frank and Jerry did it almost without any outside money, while Cree and Beatrice have done it with very small rounds of Angel funding. Aspiring entrepreneurs, you have much to learn from them.
Also note, in Frank and Jerry’s case, they used services to bootstrap, while Sridhar used a lower profile, but successful product which became a cashcow.
I encourage Indian entrepreneurs experienced in the IT outsourcing industry, and alarmed by my Death of Indian Outsourcing piece to read Sudhakar Ram’s Wave 3 of Indian Outsourcing. Other related pieces on the topic are: India’s Labor Arbitrage Strategy, Indian IT: The Next 8 Years, and Silicon Valley’s Unknown Indian.
Also, here are my related Forbes columns on the topic.
And finally, here is my Open Letter to IIT Students written in response to a student’s email from IIT Kharagpur, in which I request students to start looking outside IT for entrepreneurial opportunities. As examples, I would like to cite the story of ERI, a water desalination company that is about to go public soon, and SunPower, a solar energy company that has had a successful run in the public market. I want to also highlight a different style of entrepreneurship that comes from Harish Hande, CEO of SELCO, bringing solar electricity to the poor.
As always, comments and discussions are very welcome.
Here’s my latest Forbes Column: The Smartest Unknown Indian Entrepreneur.
What is touching, is that the entrepreneur profiled here is also infinitely humble, embarrassed by this sort of attention from the media. In my private exchange with him, I have expressed my deepest respect, and the reason I want to feature this story repeatedly is that I truly think it is a case study worth emulating.
So Indian entrepreneurs, please pay attention to this story. There are many lessons buried in it.
“Are you kidding? No way!”
In 2008, the IT and IT enabled services (ITES / BPO) industries are supposed to be the major drivers of India’s economic growth. According to Nasscom, the two industries combined will employ 4 Million people, account for 7% of GDP, and 33% of foreign exchange inflow.
Death of this industry is far from anyone’s mind.
Let me tell you a story. <!–more–>
There is a tiny company in Silicon Valley called InsideView. It helps customers in sales lead generation, qualification and opportunity identification research using technology and a software-as-a-service (SaaS) business model.
In November 2007, InsideView acquired a company called TrueAdvantage which did the exact same thing manually, with a team of 150 people in India. TrueAdvantage had 2500 customers, all of which are being transitioned over to InsideView’s software-driven solution. All 150 people at TrueAdvantage have been laid off for no fault of their own.
The human tragedy may sound familiar to the Michigan auto-workers who have been losing their jobs to China, or the IT/Call-center workers in the US whose jobs have been off-shored to India. They have all been laid off for no fault of their own.
The reality is that wages are rising in India. The cost advantage for off-shoring to Indian used to be at least 1:6. Today, it is at best 1:3. Attrition is scary.
Jobs that are low-value-add and easily automatable should and will disappear over the next decade. People talk a lot about India moving up the value chain. Yes, some of that has indeed happened. An industry that started gaining momentum with the Y2K porting projects has blossomed beautifully into one that offers a much more comprehensive spectrum of services.
Yet, India, for all its glory, is still the world’s back-office. The IT / ITES industry is a “services” industry. In simple terms, the Indians don’t do the thinking. The customers do. India executes.
As a result, India has not learn’t to come up with technology products of its own. Barring a few exceptions, the huge amount of venture capital chasing India finds it difficult to be deployed. There is way too much money, way too few deals. Instead, tech-sector VCs are now diverting capital to retail, real estate, hotels, etc.
The $30 Billion IT / ITES services industry, meanwhile, is slowly and surely, losing its competitive advantage.
You see, most of the 4 Million people that the industry employs have already “arrived”. They have breezed through the milestones that their fathers had to toil all their lives to reach. A phone. A watch. A TV. A car. A house.
They are complacent. They will not take risks. They have “outsourced” thinking to their customers.
As the 1:3 cost structure becomes 1:1.5, it will soon become inefficient to use Indian labor. Why not Oklahoma or British Columbia? For many Europeans, Eastern Europe has already become more compelling than India. The pure labor arbitrage equation will no longer balance.
In a decade, what would happen to the newly minted affluent class created by the Indian IT boom?
Companies like Infosys and Wipro, assuming that they want to preserve their business momentum, will need to diversify their portfolios away from pure body-shopping and process competencies to technology driven advantages. The obvious place for them to go is Software-As-A-Service (SaaS). Their current market caps and cash reserves are high, so an easy way for this transition would be via acquisitions. Wherever SaaS and manual BPO services overlap, they should cut the manual and replace with SaaS to the extent possible.
To give you an accurate picture, none of this is happening quite yet. In fact, Infosys is hiring tens of thousands of new employees in India still. The mood is upbeat. The golden goose is still laying large, warm eggs, enough to feed the 4 Million and their families.
Meanwhile, the workforce is getting comfortable in their cubicle chairs, just as the turkey gets comfortable before Thanksgiving.
Sujai Karampuri sent me his recent piece, Ground realities from a technology product company in India .
Sujai’s company Sloka Telecom is building Wimax base stations, and recently, they have won an important validation in France at Saint Medard en Jalles (5.8 GHz Wimax deployment).
I know that Sujai is pounding the doors of the VCs to get Sloka funded. His frustrations are real, and reflective of the situation and ground realities in India. Continue reading ‘Building a Telecom Equipment Startup from India’
My first experience of technology entrepreneurship in India was in 1994 while I was still a grad student at MIT. The most vivid memory I have of that experience is that it took me 6 months to get a phone line. It was before wireless. It was, most certainly, before venture capital in India.
Things have obviously come a long way. Last summer, I did a body of research on the Indian entrepreneurship scene, as I watched huge amounts of capital finding its way to India. Through that work, I also came to the conclusion that there is way too much money, and not enough fundable deals, and that India needs more incubator funds.
A year has gone by. Not a whole lot has changed.
So I chose to revisit the topic of Incubators in India in a series of posts, on which I would like to hear from entrepreneurs, investors, incubator managers, and whomever else in the ecosystem with meaningful input.
Here are the posts:
I look forward to your comments.