Had a couple of very hectic weeks with TiECon and couple of our partners visiting India. The opportunity to go around, see 10 “shortlisted” companies with some of my partners last week gave a good sense of contrast between what is expected in a mature venture system like the valley, and what is available here. One of the things that stood out was the lack of detail on pitches. What is interesting is that most of the missing detail did not seem to be a function of articulation, but of ignorance – people who had missed the details had not thought about those aspects. Also, most of the people who had missed details had not operated in those markets before. Nine out of ten presentations had no competitive analysis whatsoever — some more mentioned competition but with a dismissive tone.

I have noticed some of the same contrast in my visits to valley pitches. And if I may draw a parallel, I have seen similar lack of detail in corporate environment here in India — VP level plans and presentations get approved often without sufficient level of detail and analysis.

In terms of our education process for entrepreneurs on venturewoods and elsewhere, we have long focussed on “what all to cover” which again leads to a shallow view of the plan — entrepreneurs look at a question, and answer it at a high level, and they are done. We need to start putting more emphasis on the level of detailing. Maybe if someone can share their pitches, we could do a critique. I have a lot of, what in our view are, good and bad pitches, but I dont have the right to share any of them… Any volunteers?

0