Creating Value for All: Strategies for Doing Business with the Poor
UNDP Report: July 2008
See the full 180 page report at
http://www.undp.org/gimlaunch/press/docs/GIM_EN.pdf
(around 7MB PDF file)
India’s leading venture capital and startup blog
Creating Value for All: Strategies for Doing Business with the Poor
UNDP Report: July 2008
See the full 180 page report at
http://www.undp.org/gimlaunch/press/docs/GIM_EN.pdf
(around 7MB PDF file)
To all who are interested in social entrepreneurship
A good list of social entrepreneurship resources
See their fellows (only US based), but for the ideas that can be implemented anywhere in the world if relevant at
http://www.draperrichardsfoundation.org/fellows/index.html
->There are too many things possible in social entrepreneurship in India and worldwide.
Vator.tv is a social network for technology startup companies which
gives entrepreneurs a platform to connect with Investors, Acquirers
and Media.
Vator.tv gives Investors useful tools to keep track of companies and industries that interest them, and provides a revolutionary interaction platform to discover the best investment opportunities in technology.
Startup School is an annual free conference for hackers interested in startups. This year notable speakers included Mike Arrington, Marc Andreessen, Jeff Bezos and Paul Graham. The website is http://startupschool.org/
The videos are at http://omnisio.com/startupschool08
Interesting Post
Where Are India’s Innovative Companies, Products and Solutions?
India produces some of the brightest minds in technology, science and medicine yet has not demonstrated any truly large scale and breakthrough innovations in those fields. more here
I mean…..why NOT fill the gaps?
Interesting post at onstartups.com
Founders:Â Stop Hoping for Magic and Start Working
Did I hoped for magic? Yes.
Did you?
Gartner’s top 10 strategic technologies for 2008
1. Green IT
2. Unified Communications (UC)
3. Business Process Management
4. Metadata Management
5. Virtualization 2.0
6. Mashups & Composite Applications
7. Web Platform & WOA
8. Computing Fabrics
9. Real World Web
10. Social Software
Are there any core technology focused Angel Investor/VC located in India for 6, 7, 9 above dealing with Early-Stage or Seed-Stage? (except Google, Intel or Sequia )
From Marc Andreessen(Founder, Netscape, Opsware and Ning)’s blog
The Pmarca Guide to Startups, part 1: Why not to do a startup
and
The Pmarca Guide to Startups, part 2: When the VCs say “no”
Is it interesting?
I saw this in Internet-
StudiVZ, a German clone of Facebook was sold for 100 million Euros to Holtzbrick Verlag, a giant German publishing company, reports3 Spiegel Online, a well known German news outlet. The Chinese clone of Facebook was acquired back in October 2006. StudiVZ claims to have a million users.
Is it a start-up idea?
Clones of websites with high number of users or high volumes of uses?
And similarly, clones of products with high-volume of sales?
I guess the number of users, amount of uses and sales are more important than cloning. Cloning, of course, can innovate on something to make it more relevant and useful.
“Why Companies Should Have Open Business Models” is a recent article in SMR.
Just wondering, is it a start-up idea? I mean why SOME start-ups should have a open business model for open innovation and resultant FASTER GROWTH? I am talking about startups because of two trends — rising R&D costs and decreased product revenues at least in the initial period.
I guess it applies more to the social entrepreneurship approach with catalytic innovation also. For more on catalytic innovation, see my post http://www.venturewoods.org/index.php/2006/12/13/hbr-dec2006-article-abstract-disruptive-innovation-for-social-change/
Please see the abstract pasted below from the latest Sloan Management Review
http://sloanreview.mit.edu/smr/issue/2007/winter/08/
Why Companies Should Have Open Business Models
Henry W. Chesbrough
Topic: Corporate Strategy
Reprint 48208; Winter 2007, Vol. 48, No. 2, pp. 22-28
Because of two trends — rising R&D costs and decreased product revenues (due to shorter product life cycles) — companies are finding it increasingly difficult to justify investments in innovation. Business models that embrace open innovation address both issues. The development costs of innovation are reduced by the greater use of external technology in a firm’s own R&D process. This saves time, as well as money. And the firm no longer restricts itself to the markets it serves directly. Now it participates in other segments through licensing fees, joint ventures and spinoffs, among other means. These different streams of income create more overall revenue from the innovation.
To partake more fully in the benefits of open innovation, companies need to develop the ability to experiment with their business models, finding ways to open them up. Building that capability requires the creation of processes for conducting experiments and for assessing their results. Although that might seem obvious, many companies simply do not have such processes in place. In most organizations, no single person short of the CEO bears responsibility for the business model. Instead, business unit managers (who are usually posted to their jobs for just two to three years) tend to take the business model for granted.
To understand how an organization can open its business model, the author provides case examples of IBM, P&G and Air Products, three companies that operate in different industries with vastly different technologies and products. Each used to function with a very internally focused, closed business model. And each has since migrated to a business model that is substantially more open.